The inclusion of "electronic eyes" in the legal system and the installation of monitoring should be cautious

The important value of surveillance systems for public safety is self-evident, but the regulation of installing surveillance cameras is worrying. While maintaining public safety, it also inevitably conflicts with protecting citizens' privacy. In this situation, it is even more necessary for relevant departments to formulate relevant regulations and quickly incorporate "electronic eyes" into the legal regulatory system, making detailed provisions for the installation location and method of cameras, and truly applying cameras in a "positive" manner.

With the improvement of security awareness, many residential areas have installed cameras nowadays, but some cameras have become "blind" and empty decorations, and in the end, innocent citizens are the ones who are harmed. But then again, is installing more cameras necessarily a good thing, and how can citizens' privacy be maintained? How can I place the camera's frontal function on *?

For example, when it comes to community security surveillance cameras, they may seem like inconspicuous "decorations" in daily life, but when residents in the community suffer personal or property damage, the cameras can provide important clues for solving cases and protect the interests of residents. As mentioned in the report, Weifang Shengrong Square has 102 cameras located in the main corridors of each building, on every main road, and at every entrance and exit of the community. Although most homeowners come to check the videos for trivial matters, it is also evident that installing "electronic eyes" appropriately in the community has played a positive role for residents. At least they can have a certain deterrent effect on those who are 'unconscious', and the time for petty theft in the community will naturally be reduced accordingly.

Of course, cameras are 'dead', people are alive, and many residents are worried. Whether in residential areas or other public places, the angle of most surveillance cameras can be controlled. However, those who implement security monitoring will definitely aim their cameras at public passages or parking spaces, rather than at residents' bedroom windows or other places?

In fact, such concerns are not without reason. Recently, some "hot" videos have been frequently released on the internet. Although some of the protagonist's actions were excessive, they did not violate the law or moral bottom line. However, the operator of the "electronic eye" secretly released the video for various reasons, infringing on the rights and interests of the parties involved. We cannot help but question, who gave them the right to pry into others' privacy? Who has the right to disclose surveillance videos at will, or even upload them to the Internet for thousands of people to read and download?

With the development of society, "electronic eyes" undoubtedly play an important role in maintaining social order and improving people's sense of security, but the conflicts caused by them are also escalating. The "electronic eye" camera, as a double-edged sword, not only bears the responsibility of maintaining public safety, but also needs to remain vigilant and not infringe upon the privacy rights of citizens. From this, it can be seen that cameras not only need to be installed, but also need to be installed in an "artistic" and "compliant" manner.